Hiring
decisions are made slowly. Only a few companies will use speed to their advantage. Ability to make
the call allows those companies to spot talent and get it, when the opportunity
arises.
With an
average time to hire of 60 days, majority of companies really take their time with
the recruitment process.
There are many reasons why hiring cycle is long:
1. Candidates must observe their notice
period with their current employer.
2. The candidate requirements evolve as
the interview process starts, so that search criteria change and the process extends.
3. A long-term vacancy causes hiring
manager to reorganize the work so that s/he is no longer so committed to fill
the vacancy and more picky about the new hire.
4. HR and hiring manager hope that
tomorrow will bring even a more perfect match between the vacancy and the candidate.
5. Companies do not have a clear
picture about vacancy costs. Not only in Dollars, but also in terms of team morale,
job stretch and amount of overtime (and corresponding burn-out risk).
6. Companies cannot set the right
recruitment strategy for particular type of vacancy. They usually try least
expensive recruitment channels, employee referrals and job ads. Only with
rising desperation, companies engage with recruitment agencies, but even then they
are concerned about the recruitment costs and tend to be not very committed to
the candidates presented by external recruiters, often in connection with point
3.
7. Companies stick rigidly to the
budgets. They make a big issue over the difference between the budget and the salary
expectations of the candidate. Sometimes, the deals are broken over 5K on an
annual basis in the salary range of 60K. As the result, the vacancy remains vacant
for another 4-8 weeks, hiring managers frustrated, HR busy with a rising
frustration levels as well and finally applicants suspicious why they see the
same job ad for weeks.
8. The drive to save recruitment costs
at the expense of productivity and ability to execute the business strategy is
an overwhelming and recurring issue. Finance does not see through, HR cannot
make a business case, time passes.
9. The decision makers are unable to make the call. They have no stamina
or no confidence, call it what you want, they’re simply indecisive and that’s
bad for recruitment.
For SMEs speed
can be a recruiting advantage. However, even so it is good for HR not to act on
the decisions made immediately. Two lessons, I learned a few years ago.
First, it
is good for the hiring manager and HR to sleep over a hiring decision. This
happened to me twice and it should not happen the third time. When the hiring
managers say “Please issue an offer”, it is good to wait one day to do it. On
those two particular occasions, the hiring manager came to me the next day with
a question, whether the offer has been made, because he no longer wants to hire
the candidate. Since the offer was send, I could either withdraw the offer
right away or maneuver the offer negotiation process in a way that the
candidate did not accept it.
Second, it
is also good that the candidate sleeps over the job interview held. Since good
candidates do have more then only one option, it is good to give them time to
reflect on the job role, the company and the interview itself. Making an offer
to the candidate shortly after the interview was for many overwhelming. They
later reveled that they would expect it on the third day or so.
No comments:
Post a Comment