Recruitment and Training Interdependency

HR sub-processes, recruitment and training, may be operated and managed independently. But essentially, they are two sides of one coin. Therefore, if recruitment and training professionals work in isolation, then, for example, an incompatible set of metrics will be used causing inefficiencies.

Companies that measure cost per hire and hold hiring managers accountable for this outcome will see lower cost per hire over time. But, the unintended consequence of this action is usually a lower quality of new hires resulting in increasing training needs and total labor costs. Similarly, poorly designed training may be ineffective and will not bring about a change in performance. This may negatively impact employee job satisfaction which in turn influences the attrition rate. An escalating attrition rate causes greater demand for recruitment.

Therefore, when analyzing recruitment and training dynamics, a clear understanding must exist between which competencies have to be bought (recruitment) and which can be built (training and development). The traditional trade-off is; “Hire for attitude and train for skills and/or knowledge”.

In China, English is a skill that must be hired and trained for. Even so, two divergent approaches exist for tackling this challenge. The first approach involves prioritizing the hiring of employees with solid professional knowledge and mediocre English skills in hopes of improving their language skills through training and development programs. The second approach focuses on hiring employees with high levels of English proficiency while providing training in the relevant professional area. In this case, the English majors quite often pursue a part-time post-graduate business degree to boost their career.